![]() ![]() To anticipate my verdict : one can again discern in his discussion a basic principle and a method, as well as a final state that these project. In this essay, my concern is Wilde's success in constructing a different theory of self-realization in p_e Profundis. ![]() ![]() In my- view, Wilde's analysis of criticism has enough development and coherence to earn recognition as a theory of criticism, whatever objections one might subsequently raise to the theory. In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:ģ95 OSCAR WILDE AS THEORIST: THE CASE OF DE_ PROFUNDIS By Bruce Bashford (SUNY, Stony Brook) Earlier I have argued that Wilde's paradoxically stated position in his two dialogues on criticism, "The Decay of Lying" and "The Critic as Artist," is more consistent than it first appears.1 More specifically, my claim was that in the dialogues Wilde defines a principle by which meanings originate in art and criticism, presents a method by which the critic can elaborate the power of this principle, and describes the particular kind of self-realization that the critic can thereby achieve. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |